Before we get started, I need to make one thing clear about Red Scare History. This post is not about the real Soviet Menace which threatened the world with nuclear destruction. Instead, it is about anti-Communist propaganda run rampant, scaring Americans into thinking that their world could end in a heartbeat — and with very little warning.

Americans were conditioned to fear Communists in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, years before our World War II partnership with the Russians began.

This First Red Scare was spearheaded by an American business community that was fearful of labor unrest and protective of corporate profits.

As John Steinbeck said in The Grapes of Wrath:  A RED is any son of a bitch that wants thirty cents when we’re paying twenty-five.

Industrial leaders, especially, convinced large numbers of Americans that their livelihoods were threatened by Communists.

Years before the American Communist Party was actually founded, the word “communist” was associated with being un American. This was  especially true after the 1917 Russian Revolution when Bolshevism became totally entrenched in Russian life.

The founding of the American Communist Party in Chicago in 1919 made the previously abstract fear of communism a concrete reality. Woodrow Wilson was the US president at the time. He committed arms and troops to the war against Bolshevism abroad and increased the level of anti-Communist propaganda at home as well.

Throughout the 1920s, Americans increasingly feared that Marxism/Leninism would penetrate the US and cause the death of capitalism.

During the Great Depression, communism did gain a foothold among the American working and intellectual classes who opposed the policies of President Hoover that they felt had plunged the nation into economic disaster.

Owing to the New Deal‘s social policies, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s congressional opponents spent much of their time proposing bills that would limit immigration, free speech, and free assembly for suspected Communists as well as deport foreign-born Communists.

Red scare history tells us that Congress often flirted with the idea of legally prohibiting the American Communist Party.

The war against Germany and the wartime alliance with the Soviet Union temporarily altered these stereotypes. Official government posters and commercial advertising portrayed the Big Three Allies — the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union — marching toward victory. But after the war, the USSR was demonized once again.

By 1948, anti-Communist militancy was sweeping the country.

Communism was blamed for all of America’s ills. Fear of spies, threats of a Communist takeover, and paranoia about nuclear war were offered in large doses in print and on film.

Here is a sampling of early Second Red Scare events:

• May 18, 1948: Congressmen Richard M. Nixon’s and Karl Mundt’s bill to “protect the United States against un-American and subversive activities” — the Mundt-Nixon Bill — is passed in the House by a vote of 319 to 58. The bill, also known as the Internal Security Act, makes it a crime to attempt to establish a totalitarian dictatorship by any means. In effect, this makes the existence of the Communist Party itself a violation of the law.
• June 1948: Washington Witch Hunt by Bert Andrews, which decries the recent abuses of civil liberties by Red hunters, is published by Random House.
• July 20, 1948: After a thirteen-month investigation, a New York grand jury returns indictments against twelve members of the National Board of the Communist Party, who are charged with conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States.
• July 28, 1948: Elizabeth Bentley, dubbed “the Red Spy Queen ” by the press, testifies before a Senate subcommittee and, three days later to HUAC (the House Un-American Activities Committee ), that she had been the courier to a Washington-based Soviet spy ring during the war. She also implicates the man she replaced in that capacity, Whittaker Chambers .
• December 15, 1948: Former State Department official Alger Hiss is indicted on two counts of perjury for denying his role in passing classified documents to the Russians, but his first trial ends on July 8, 1949, with a hung jury.

Red-Baiting reached its zenith in the United States in the mid- to late 1950s, persisting to some degree until the end of the “Evil Empire” in 1989. Its demise was made most visible in January 1990 when Moscow’s first McDonald’s opened its doors with a Big Mac priced at 3.75 rubles.

For More information on Red Scare History see Red Scared by Michael Barson and Steven Heller.

If you’re interested in the Red Scare, be sure to take a look at Cold War Magazine’s Red Scare Issue.  Click the image below to read, share, and download.

Cold War Studies has come up with a list of 10 Red Scare films for holiday gift giving. To purchase from Amazon, just click on each movie title. To view trailers for most of the movies go the Cold War Studies You Tube Channel.

In no particular order, the Red Scare films are:

THE RED MENACE

The Red Menace has been called an overheated expose of Communist Party treachery. Narrated by Los Angeles city councilman, Lloyd G. Douglas, the plot follows an American Vet named Bill Jones as he deals with the unresponsiveness of a government agency called Veteran’s Aid. The agency is responsible for making the G.I. Bill’s promise of a low interest home loan a reality. Bill can’t get them to help him though, and he becomes very disillusioned.  His negative feelings make him a prime target for a Communist cell that is always looking for new recruits and also offering their own version of the American dream.

Nobody actually speaks in this film. Instead, they spout phrases like “My flag has three colors, not one that’s the color of blood!”  Almost every line consists of either pro or anti-communist cliches and rhetoric.

The basic premise is understandable in light of the times, but it will not be taken seriously today.

CONSPIRATOR

In Conspirator, Elizabeth Taylor is shocked to learn that her husband — a British officer played by Robert Taylor — is a murderous Communist agent.

GUILTY OF TREASON

Guilty of Treason is the story of Cardinal Mindzenty of Hungary whom the Reds framed as an anti-Semite and imprisoned in 1949. Mindzenty, played by Charles Bickford, was released from prison in 1956.

[NOTE: The trailer for this film is not available.]

THE IRON PETTICOAT

In The Iron Petticoat, Bob Hope and Katherine Hepburn take a page from Ninotchka . Hope plays a wise-cracking American while Hepburn is a frosty Soviet official.

SILK STOCKINGS

Like Ninotchka? Here’s another take – off for you. Silk Stockings is a musical remake of the 1939 film. Cyd Charisse plays Greta Garbo’s role as the no – nonsense party official sent to retrieve three colleagues who have been seduced by the charms of Paris. Fred Astaire plays the American who tries to win her indoctrinated heart. Cole Porter’s music provides the magic.

THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE

In The Manchurian Candidate, one of my all time favorites, Laurence Harvey plays a former Korean War POW who has been brainwashed. Years later he is used to assassinate a presidential nominee. Frank Sinatra is memorable as Harvey’s commanding officer who overcomes his own brainwashing to figure out and defuse the plot. The Communist ringleader of the scheme turns out to be Harvey’s mother, portrayed chillingly by Angela Lansbury. From the Richard Condon novel.

FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE

Starring Sean Connery, From Russia With Love is the second film in the James Bond series. In this film, Agent 007 faces off against a multitude of villains. Bond is sent to Istanbul to steal a state – of – the – art Russian decoding machine. To accomplish this, he seduces a gorgeous clerk from the Soviet embassy who helps him out in the end.

Many think this is the best of the James Bond series!!

THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD

The Spy Who Came in From the Cold is based on spy master John Le Carre’s best selling novel. Richard Burton plays a burned out agent who’s asked to carry out one more impossible mission for queen and country.

THE IPCRESS FILE

The Ipcress File, based on Len Deighton’s best seller, is in the same vein as The Spy Who Came in From the Cold. Michael Caine plays Harry Palmer, a crook converted into a secret agent.

REDS

Reds has been mentioned in several previous posts on Cold War Studies. It is a quintessential Hollywood spectacle, portraying events leading to the First Red Scare. Warren Beatty plays John Reed, a radical American journalist. Set during the days surrounding the October Revolution of 1917, The film has a stellar cast, including Diane Keaton as Reed’s lover.

If you’re interested in the Red Scare, be sure to take a look at Cold War Magazine’s Red Scare Issue.  Just click on the image below to read, share, and download.

When it came time for Look magazine to provide its readership with a handy method of identifying Communists, it turned to Renaissance man Leo Cherne (1912-1999).

Here is what Leo had to say: (From Look Magazine, March 4, 1947)

The real Communist is not a liberal or a progressive. He believes in Russia first and a Soviet America. He accepts the doctrines of dictatorship as practiced in Russia. And he is prepared to use a dictator’s tactics of lies and violence to realize his ambitions.

Because the whole Communist apparatus is geared to secrecy, it is not always easy to determine just who is a Communist. But whether he is a Party card-holder or a fellow traveler, the American Communist is not like other Americans. To the Communist, everything — his country, his job, his family — take second place to his Party duty. Even his sex life is synchronized with the obligations of The Cause.

Mr. Cherne then offers several lists “to help the patriotic and paranoid American ID Commies and Pinkos:”

HOW TO IDENTIFY AN AMERICAN COMMUNIST

There is no simple definition of an American Communist. However, certain general classifications can be set up. And if either a person or an organization falls within  most of these classifications, that person or organization can be said to be following the Communists’ lead.

These identifying characteristics include:

1. The belief that the war waged by Great Britain and her allies during the period from August 1939 to June 1941 (the period of the war before Russia was invaded), was an “imperialistic” war and a game of power politics.
2. The support of foreign policy, which agrees always with that followed by Soviet Russia, and which changes as the USSR policy changes.
3. The argument that any foreign or domestic policy, which does not fit the Communist plan, is advanced for ulterior motives and is not in the best interests of either the people or of world peace.
4. The practice of criticizing only American, British, and Chinese policies, and never criticizing Soviet policies.
5. Continually receiving favorable publicity in such Communist publications as the Daily Worker and the New Masses.
6. Continually appearing as sponsor or co-worker of such known Communist-front groups as the Committee to Win the Peace, the Civil Rights Congress, the National Negro Congress, and the groups which can be described as Communist inspired because they fall within the classification set forth here.
7. Continually charging critics with being “Fascists,” no matter whether the criticism comes from liberals, conservatives, reactionaries, or those who really are Fascists.
8. Arguing for a class society by pitting one group against another; and putting special privileges ahead of community needs as, for example, claiming that labor had privileges but had no responsibilities in dealing with management.
9. Declaring that capitalism and democracy are “decadent” because some injustices exist under those systems.

Of course, actual membership is 100 per cent proof, but this kind of proof is difficult to obtain.

These are the five basic layers that the Communists rely on for their strength:

1. The Party member – who openly or secretly holds a membership card.
2. The fellow-traveler – who is not a Party member but who is carefully trained to follow the Communist policy.
3. The sympathizer – who may disagree with some polices, but who is in general agreement with Communist objectives.
4. The opportunist – who is unconcerned with Party goals or tactics but who believes, as John L. Lewis did in his CIO days, that the party can be used to his own advantage.
5. The muddled liberal – who despite deep disagreement with the Communist Party’s ultimate goals, co-operates with Party members in front organizations.

HOW NOT TO BE A SUCKER FOR A LEFT HOOK

Most Americans want to help a good cause, but don’t want to help Communists hiding behind a good-cause label. Here are tips:

1. Check credentials: Before you join or help a group, find out if it opposed Britain’s “imperialistic” war and favored isolationism before Russia was invaded in 1941; if it supported the “people’s” war after Russia was invaded; if it now favors the veto as used by Russia in the UN.
2. Signing petitions: Are you getting your name on a Communist list?
3. Contributing money: Check carefully; you may be paying a Communist.
4. On the escalator: Is your support of one group involving you in causes you didn’t know about? Check all affiliations.
5. Resolutions: Does the group you support suddenly endorse other groups you know nothing about?
6. Politics: Is your “nonpartisan” group endorsing candidates? Who are they?
7. Speakers: Who are the outsiders invited to address your meetings?
8. Fly-by-night issues: Does your group support policies also supported by the Communist Party, and then forget those policies as soon as the Party line changes?
9. Double standard: Is it sensitive about American policy in China and British policy in Palestine, but quiet about Russian policy in Iran, Poland, Rumania, Bulgaria?
10. Literature: Does literature handed out at meetings endorse Party causes?
11. Social life: Are you urged to buy tickets to other groups’ events? You may be contributing to other causes.
12. Demonstrations and conferences: Does the local group which was set up to study the cost of living, for example, send delegates to conferences which pass resolutions on atomic energy control?
13. Membership: Watch who joins and who resigns. Harold Ickes recently resigned from the Independent Citizens Committee of the Arts and Sciences; Marion Hargrove quit the Duncan-Paris Post of the American Legion and the National Committee to Win the Peace.

Want your own copy of Cherne’s original article? Just do an online search for “what is a communist Look Magazine.”

If you’re interested in the Red Scare, be sure to take a look at Cold War Magazine’s Red Scare Issue. Click on the image below to read, share, and download.

FAIL-SAFE is a 1964 film directed by Sidney Lumet. The movie is based on the 1962 novel of the same name by Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler. It tells the story of a fictional Cold War nuclear crisis at the height of the Red Scare. The film features an all star cast, including Henry Fonda, Dan O’Herlihy, Walter Matthau, Frank Overton, and early appearances by Fritz Weaver, Dom DeLuise and Larry Hagman.

When I was a kid I had a babysitter named Rosie whom I adored. She did “big girl” things like volunteer for the Civil Air Patrol, and she let me tag along. So every Thursday evening at quarter ’til six, we walked up the block to the Methodist Church and climbed the winding stairs to their top floor. We got out the official notebook, put the binoculars around our necks and looked and listened for enemy aircraft. Our directions were to record information on every plane we heard and saw: the time; the type — passenger or other; the direction of the flight, and the number of engines.

I relived these memories recently when I saw FAIL-SAFE on TV.  The film, shot in black and white with no music, was released in 1964. Thus, the action takes place in the wake of the Cuban missile crisis during the Red Scare, portraying a world on the edge of nuclear war.

For those of you too young to remember, there were people in the US in those days who wanted to push the button first and get it over with. They truly believed that the Soviets would be caught napping, and that Soviet technology and weapons systems were faulty. They believed that we could survive whatever the ‘Commies’ threw back at us.

William, a political science professor played by Walter Matthau, brings this point home by making  “death into a game.”

As a crisis unfolds, those around him ask questions centering on acceptable losses and the consequences of nuclear war — noting the fact that there will be no or few survivors. William, in turn, talks about the ‘thrill’ of pushing the button that will start all out nuclear conflict.

William’s position provokes a heated discussion and elicits concerns from military leaders and other experts in the room with him:

• What is the purpose of war?

• Should we stop war or just limit it? Is there even such a thing as a limited war? Can there be a limited response?

• What happens when the war machine acts more quickly than the capability of men to control it?

And a question that is quite timely in today’s post 9/11 world:  Are there any circumstances under which we should shoot down our own plane?

Dramatic tension in the film revolves around a box called The Fail-Safe Box.

Has Soviet aircraft crossed over into American territory or has there been a mistake?

The President of the United States is forced to consider: what are we going to do? What do the Russians think? What are they going to do?

Remember that “back in the day” there were no shades of gray. Every war — even a thermonuclear war — was expected to have a clear winner and loser. Moreover,  MAD or Mutual Assured Destruction, a military doctrine in play during this period,  allowed each superpower to destroy the other many times over. The Cold War had become a conflict more dangerous and unmanageable than anything faced before.

Americans had once enjoyed superior nuclear force, an unchallenged economy, strong alliances, and a trusted imperial President to direct this incredible power against the Soviets. Now many perceived that Russian forces were close to achieving nuclear equality.

Today’s viewer may find FAIL-SAFE to be overly dramatic. But it provides insight into some of the most pressing issues raised by the Red Scare and the half century Cold War conflict. Some of them remain relevant today.

If you’re interested in the Red Scare, be sure to take a look at Cold War Magazine’s Red Scare Issue.  Click on the image below to read, share, and download.