• Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • About
  • Contact

Cold War

Before, During, and After the Cold War

  • Podcast
  • Red Scare
  • Cuba
  • Iran
  • Urbanization
  • Spy
  • Afghanistan
  • Taiwan
  • Vietnam
  • Timelines

THE NIXON DOCTRINE EMPOWERS THE SHAH OF IRAN

April 11, 2013 by Lisa Reynolds Wolfe

Iran Air Force (IRIAF) F-4 Phantom II interceptor fighter bomber United States Navy airforce AIM-9 Sidewinder aIM-7 Sparrow AIM-120 AMRAAM AGM-65 Maverick AGM-88 HARM (6)

The Middle East war of June 1967 initiated a worldwide oil scare, driven especially by changing realities in the international petroleum market.  

The US was becoming increasingly dependent on oil imports, particularly from the Middle East, and oil exporting states were growing more and more empowered.  The situation bolstered the shah’s belief that he should be rewarded for providing a continuing and reliable source of supply to the West.

In 1966 the shah had successfully pressured the oil consortium (British Petroleum and eight European and American oil companies) to increase production rates in Iran.  Determined to come up with needed revenues for his Fourth Development Plan, he demanded another increase in 1968. Although American oil companies balked, the State Department — citing national security — pressured the oil companies to accept Iran’s terms, thus resolving the issue in Iran’s favor. As a result, following on the heels of Taiwan’s achievement of self-sufficiency:

. . . increases in Iran’s exports, in its Gross National Product, and in its industrial production led to the conclusion that Iran had reached the developmental “take-off” point. American aid was virtually terminated at the end of 1967, after having supplied Iran with nearly $1 billion during the preceding fourteen years. While the United States aid program in Iran had once been regarded as one of the “more inefficient and corrupted of American overseas aid efforts,” concluded The New York Times, Washington now pointed to Iran as “one of their more notable success stories.

Taken together, oil, the termination of aid, and the shah’s new relationship with the Soviet Union encouraged greater American arms sales to Iran.

Although the Iranian army had already received M-1 rifles, 106 mm artillery, M-47 tanks, 3.5 mm  antitank rocket launchers, F-86 fighters, and C-47 transport plans, the shah wanted additional equipment. He insisted on a comprehensive radar system to guard against Soviet attack, a ground-to-air missile network to protect his Gulf coast, supersonic aircraft, and long-range surface-to-surface missiles.

American reliance on Iranian oil meant that the US was not in a position to refuse.

Both Senator William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the Defense Department’s International Security Agency (ISA) opposed the sales, but the provision of F-4D fighter planes was justified on the basis that the Soviets had supplied advanced fighters and bombers to both Iran and Egypt.

Fulbright argued that “. . . we are doing a great disservice to Iran by selling them these arms . .  . given Iran’s poverty, it should have other priorities.

In 1968, after a comprehensive defense review, the British announced their intention of withdrawing “east of Suez” by 1970.

The British departure meant the end of the security system that had operated in the Middle East for over a century, and strategic requirements moved Washington’s objectives even closer to those of the shah.

The US could not afford a power vacuum in a region that supplied 32% of the world’s petroleum and that, at the same time, held 58 % of the world’s proven energy reserves. Consequently, President Nixon and Secretary of State Kissinger decided to employ a Nixon Doctrine, allowing the US to supply arms to selected client states instead of sending troops.

As David Packard, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, stated:

The best hope of reducing our overseas involvements and expenditures lies in getting allied and friendly nations to do even more in their own defense. To realise that hope, however, requires that we must continue, if requested, to give or sell them the tools they need for this bigger load we are urging them to assume.

The Nixon Doctrine relied on strong local allies to act as regional policemen. This policy, of course, meant that the shah could achieve his long held objective of acquiring substantial quantities of advanced weaponry.

Quickly Iran became “the key guardian of Western interests in the Gulf.

Iran bordered the Soviet Union and it was by far the largest and most advanced state in economic and military terms.” As the shah asserted:

The safety of the Gulf had to be guaranteed, and who but Iran could fulfill this function?

Enjoy this post? Check out our previous post on Iran here. And make sure to subscribe to Cold War Studies so you don’t miss future articles on Iran.

Filed Under: Iran

About Lisa Reynolds Wolfe

Widely published, Lisa holds a Ph.D. in Politics from New York University and a Master of Science in Policy Analysis and Public Management from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Areas of particular interest and expertise include Cold War Studies, sustainable development, heritage, and the environment.

Follow Us On Twitter

Cold War Studies Follow

A Cold War historian, Lisa holds a Ph.D. in Politics from New York University and a MS in Policy Analysis and Public Management from SUNY Stony Brook.

Avatar
Avatar Cold War Studies @coldwarstudies ·
24 Mar

https://open.substack.com/pub/danraine/p/the-renegade-ranking-engine-1?r=25vju4&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Reply on Twitter 1639304926810742787 Retweet on Twitter 1639304926810742787 Like on Twitter 1639304926810742787 Twitter 1639304926810742787
Avatar Cold War Studies @coldwarstudies ·
6 Mar

The spy movie that set Putin on the path to the KGB https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-spy-movie-that-set-putin-on-the-path-to-the-kgb/ via @spectator

Reply on Twitter 1632751714502623239 Retweet on Twitter 1632751714502623239 Like on Twitter 1632751714502623239 3 Twitter 1632751714502623239
Avatar Cold War Studies @coldwarstudies ·
27 Feb

https://hyperallergic.com/803590/documenting-the-black-history-not-taught-in-classrooms-renata-cherlise/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=D022523&utm_content=D022523+CID_e536b028e8de9a891145d386a1907826&utm_source=hn&utm_term=Documenting+the+Black+History+Not+Taught+in+Classrooms

Reply on Twitter 1630184655121965064 Retweet on Twitter 1630184655121965064 Like on Twitter 1630184655121965064 Twitter 1630184655121965064
Avatar Cold War Studies @coldwarstudies ·
17 Feb

Steve James Cold War Doc ‘A Compassionate Spy’ Lands at Magnolia Pictures https://www.thewrap.com/compassionate-spy-cold-war-documentary-magnolia/

Reply on Twitter 1626585299617988609 Retweet on Twitter 1626585299617988609 Like on Twitter 1626585299617988609 Twitter 1626585299617988609
Load More

Affiliate Disclosure

Cold War Studies is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn a small commission by advertising and linking to amazon.com. You never pay more if you puchase your Amazon product from one of our links. Thanks for supporting Cold War Studies!

 

How Much Do You Know About the Cold War?

Want to find out how much you really know about the Cold War. Click here to take our quiz. 

 

Most Popular Posts

Cold War Fashion: The Early Years (1950s-1960s)

History of Colonization in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): Precursor to Cold War Conflict

Cold War Chile

The Rise of Fast Fashion: Globalization and Waste

The Red Scare

10 Little Known Facts About the Peace Sign

Immigration to the US During the Cold War

The First Red Scare: A Timeline

Korean War Music

Cold War Argentina: The Dirty War

The Cold War: Decolonization and Conflict in the Third World

Check Out Our Red Scare White Paper

Read all about the Red Scare. Just click on the cover below.

Copyright © 2023 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in