• Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • About
  • Contact

Cold War

Before, During, and After the Cold War

  • Podcast
  • Red Scare
  • Cuba
  • Iran
  • Urbanization
  • Spy
  • Afghanistan
  • Taiwan
  • Vietnam
  • Timelines

THE NIXON APPROACH: IRAN AND IRAQ

June 7, 2010 by Lisa Reynolds Wolfe

Iran, Oil, and the Persian Gulf

By 1969 the United States was looking for assistance in carrying out its military commitments in the Third World based, primarily, on Britain’s decision to withdraw military forces from all ports east of the Suez Canal, including the Persian Gulf. (Formal confirmation of the withdrawal occurred on March 1, 1971.)

Washington believed that Britain’s departure would leave a dangerous strategic vacuum in the region and, therefore, expanded allied responsibility, announcing that the US would send arms rather than troops to critical areas.

The Nixon Doctrine, announced in 1969, provided supporters with a new justification to buy arms that would be used in the Western interest, a policy which would also allow American defense contractors to extract huge profits.

Given a green light by the Americans, the shah of Iran began to purchase a range of weapons and support systems that he expected would meet both regional contingencies and support US military objectives.

The shah was basically given military carte blanche based on the perceived American need to have a trusted local power protect US interests in the Persian Gulf. Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger believed that as America’s foreign surrogate, Iran deserved to receive whatever military goods it deemed necessary to carry out its new responsibilities.

Nixon and Kissinger thought that American and Iranian interests overlapped. In Kissinger’s words:

On all major international issues, the policies of the United States and the policies of Iran have been parallel and therefore mutually reinforcing.

From Kissinger’s perspective the shah was

… that rarest of leaders, an unconditional ally, and one whose understanding of the world situation enhance our own.

Facilitated in the 1970s by ever growing oil revenues, the Iranian government spent more money on US weapons and military support than any other non-European country.

Iran did, however, insist on a quid pro quo, insisting that the US provide covert military assistance to Kurdish rebels. The Kurds were used as proxies, serving Iranian, American, and Israeli interests until 1975 when Iran and Iraq reached an agreement favorable to Iran, moving Iraq’s border from the Iranian shore of the Shatt-al-Arab waterway to the  middle of the deepest shipping channel. Iran then cut off aid to the Kurds who were subsequently overwhelmed.

Despite this occurrence, the Iran-Iraq agreement did serve to stabilize the region by encouraging Iraq to move to a more non-aligned position and increasing American opportunities to reestablish influence in the country.

Filed Under: Iran

Stay Up to Date: Join Cold War Studies

Sign up to receive email updates and our latest blog posts.

About Lisa Reynolds Wolfe

Widely published, Lisa holds a Ph.D. in Politics from New York University and a Master of Science in Policy Analysis and Public Management from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Areas of particular interest and expertise include Cold War Studies, sustainable development, heritage, and the environment.

Trackbacks

  1. Cold War Iran says:
    July 26, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    […] The revenues of Iran’s oil industry rose from $45 million in 1950 to $20.5 billion in 1976. Concurrently, the United States embarked on a program of arms sales, with the Nixon Doctrine supplying the rationale — an extension of diplomacy that allowed the equipping of reliable allies, along with a quick and easy way to use oil money to redress the US trade balance. (For more click here) […]

How Much Do You Know?

Want to find out how much you really know about the Cold War. Click here to take our quiz. 

Disappointed with your results. Download our free ebook The Cold War A to Z to learn more.

Join Cold War Studies

Sign up below to receive occasional email updates and our latest blog posts.

We respect your privacy and will never share your information

Most Popular Posts

Cold War Chile

History of Colonization in the Middle East and North  Africa (MENA): Precursor to Cold War Conflict

Dr. Seuss and the Cold War

Egypt Transfers Loyalty From The USSR To The US In The Middle Of The Cold War

The First Red Scare: A Timeline

Cold War Argentina

Follow Us On Twitter

Cold War StudiesFollow

Avatar
Retweet on TwitterCold War Studies Retweeted
AvatarMr Rick’s History@rickbrownell·
8 Apr

How the Atomic Age influenced pop culture. It was about more than the Ka-Boom! https://bit.ly/3t0CJjO @coldwarstudies #ColdWar #nuclearwar #nukes #nuclearweapons #atombomb

3
Reply on Twitter 1379993148600975361Retweet on Twitter 13799931486009753611Like on Twitter 13799931486009753612Twitter 1379993148600975361
AvatarCold War Studies@coldwarstudies·
9 Apr

Perspective from India: Most Dangerous Spy Agencies In The World http://www.newspatrolling.com/most-dangerous-spy-agencies-in-the-world/

Reply on Twitter 1380566494136897538Retweet on Twitter 1380566494136897538Like on Twitter 1380566494136897538Twitter 1380566494136897538
Load More...

Check Out Our Red Scare White Paper

Read all about the Red Scare. Just click on the cover below.

Read a Cold War Studies White Paper on Cuban Agriculture

Read all about Cuban Agriculture. Just click on the image for easy access.

Read a Cold War Studies White Paper on Cold War FACTS

Get the inside scoop on the Cold War.  Just click on the image to get started.

Copyright © 2021 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in